Identification of spatial variability of soil physico-chemical properties for precision farming

  • 1 Department of Agrosystems and Bioclimatology, Mendel University in Brno, Zemedelska 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic


Site-specific crop management practices, known as precision farming, requires information about detailed spatial distribution of soil physico-chemical properties related to the yield productivity. Traditional mapping of soil properties in form of soil sampling is inefficient for assessment of high level of spatial variability due to the high costs. For this reason, a study was conducted within the research projects NAZV QJ1610289 and TACR TH02030133 to evaluate the digital soil mapping techniques, including proximal sensing methods in the form of on-the-go measurement of soil electrical conductivity, for mapping of agronomical relevant soil properties.The experimental work was carried out on the selected fields of Rostenice a.s. farm enterprise, located in the South Moravia region of Czech Republic. Total area of 476 ha within eight fields was measured from 2013 to 2016 by using CMD-1 instrument (GF Instruments, Czech Republic) mounted on the plastic sledges. This device measures the electrical conductivity by the principle of electromagnetic induction (EMI) with 0.98 m dipole center distance and effective depth of measurement of 1.5 m (vertical mode) or 0.75 m (horizontal). Soil properties were obtained by soil sampling in irregular grid with the density of 1 sample per 3 ha. Soil samples were taken from the depth of 30 cm and analyzed for soil texture (percentage of clay, silt and sand particles), content of available nutrients (P, K, Mg, Ca), cation exchange capacity (CEC), soil organic matter content (SOM) and wilting point (WP). The results showed different level of spatial variability among the observed fields. The correlation analysis proved differences in main sensitivity of EMI to the soil properties, mainly the percentage of clay particles smaller than 0.002 mm (r = 0.598). The correlation between EMI and nutrients content in soil and pH value was significant only for few fields. These outcomes showed, that rather than predictor of soil properties could be on-the-go measurement of soil EC used for identification of main zones within the fields at high spatial level.



  1. Brevik, E. C., Fenton, T. E., Lazari, A. (2003). Differences in EM38 Readings Taken Above Crop Residues Versus Readings Taken with Instrument-Ground Contact. Precision Agriculture 4(4): 351- 358.
  2. Brevik, E. C., Fenton, T. E., Lazari, A. (2006). Soil electrical conductivity as a function of soil water content and implications for soil mapping. Precision Agriculture 7(6): 393-404.
  3. Corwin, D. L., Lesch, S. M. (2003). Application of soil electrical conductivity to precision agriculture: Theory, principles, and guidelines. Agronomy Journal 95(3): 455-471.
  4. Corwin, D. L., Lesch, S. M. (2005a). Apparent soil electrical conductivity measurements in agriculture. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 46(1-3): 11-43.
  5. Corwin, D. L., Lesch, S. M. (2005b). Characterizing soil spatial variability with apparent soil electrical conductivity: I. Survey protocols. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 46(1-3 SPEC. ISS.): 103-133.
  6. Corwin, D. L., Plant, R. E. (2005). Applications of apparent soil electrical conductivity in precision agriculture. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 46(1-3): 1-10.
  7. Domsch, H., Giebel, A. (2004). Estimation of soil textural features from soil electrical conductivity recorded using the EM38. Precision Agriculture 5(4): 389-409.
  8. Doolittle, J. A., Brevik, E. C. (2014). The use of electromagnetic induction techniques in soils studies. Geoderma 223–225: 33-45.
  9. Godwin, R. J., Miller, P. C. H. (2003). A Review of the Technologies for Mapping Within-field Variability. Biosystems Engineering 84(4): 393-407.
  10. Heil, K., Schmidhalter, U. (2012). Characterisation of soil texture variability using the apparent soil electrical conductivity at a highly variable site. Computers & Geosciences 39(0): 98-110.
  11. Heiniger, R. W., McBride, R. G., Clay, D. E. (2003). Using soil electrical conductivity to improve nutrient management. Agronomy Journal 95(3): 508-519.
  12. Kerry, R., Oliver, M. A. (2003). Variograms of ancillary data to aid sampling for soil surveys. Precision Agriculture 4(3): 261-278.
  13. Lesch, S. M. (2005). Sensor-directed response surface sampling designs for characterizing spatial variation in soil properties. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 46(1-3): 153-179.
  14. Lukas, V., Neudert, L., Kren, J. (2009). Mapping of soil conditions in precision agriculture. Acta Agrophysica 13(2): 393-405.
  15. Moral, F. J., Terrón, J. M., Silva, J. R. M. d. (2010). Delineation of management zones using mobile measurements of soil apparent electrical conductivity and multivariate geostatistical techniques. Soil and Tillage Research 106(2): 335-343.
  16. Morari, F., Castrignano, A., Pagliarin, C. (2009). Application of multivariate geostatistics in delineating management zones within a gravelly vineyard using geo-electrical sensors. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 68(1): 97-107.
  17. Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic (2015). Agriculture status report 2009 (In Czech „Zpráva o stavu zemědělství ČR za rok 2015“). Prague, 2016.
  18. Peralta, N. R., Costa, J. L. (2013). Delineation of management zones with soil apparent electrical conductivity to improve nutrient management. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 99(0): 218- 226.
  19. Serrano, J. M., Shahidian, S., da Silva, J. R. M. (2013). Apparent electrical conductivity in dry versus wet soil conditions in a shallow soil. Precision Agriculture 14(1): 99-114.
  20. Tarr, A. B., Moore, K. J., Burras, C. L., Bullock, D. G., Dixon, P. M. (2005). Improving map accuracy of soil variables using soil electrical conductivity as a covariate. Precision Agriculture 6(3): 255-270.

Article full text

Download PDF