Evaluation of bacterial isolates for stimulating the growth of young melon (Cucumis Melo L.) plants

  • 1 Maritsa Vegetable Crops Research Institute, Plovdiv, Bulgaria


The unsustainable use of agrochemicals to protect the agricultural crops and increase the yield is one of the reasons for contamination of soil, fresh- and groundwater. As an alternative to chemical fertilizers and pesticides, biofertilization with plant growthpromoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) can cause increasing of yield, diseases and pests resistance. The aim of the current study is to evaluate the potential of some bacterial isolates to stimulate plant growth of young melon plants of two commercial Bulgarian melon cultivars. Melon seedlings at cotyledon stage are inoculated with the bacterial isolates. 35 days after inoculation, the main growth parameters of the plants are measured: fresh and dry weight of shoots, number of leaves, length and thickness of the steam and total leaf area. The obtained results reveal that all of the tested bacterial isolates insignificantly increase the sixth plant growth indexes of Pobeditel melon plants but the best results are observed with B 92 treatment. Plants from Hybrid 1 genotype are positively and significantly influenced by all bacterial isolates. The best results are observed with B 86 treatment – up to 2.7-fold increase in total leaves area and up to 2.4-fold increase in stem length. Plants treated with B 86 also have 50-70% higher shoot fresh and dry weight, 24% thicker stems and 30% higher number of leaves compared to non-inoculated controls. Some of the tested bacterial isolates especially B92 and B97 stimulate the absorption and utilization of major nutrients as N and P.



  1. Altieri M., C. Nicholls. Agroecology Scaling Up for Food Sovereignty and Resiliency. Book: Sustainable Agriculture Reviews. 2012, 11:1-29.
  2. Artursson V., R. Finlay, J. Jansson. Interactions between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and bacteria and their potential for stimulating plant growth. Environ Microbiol. 2006, 8:1–10.
  3. Berg G. Plant–microbe interactions promoting plant growth and health: perspectives for controlled use of microorganisms in agriculture. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009, 84:11–18.
  4. Bly U., H. Woodard, R. Gelderman. Biological inoculants and other products for soybeans during 2009, (44309 and 44409) Soil/Water Research South Dakota State University, Research Progress Report, 2009.
  5. Brudman S., E. Jurkevitch, Y. Okon. Recent advances in the use of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) in agriculture. In: Subba RN, Dommergues YR (eds) Microbial interactions in agriculture and forestry, Science Publishers, Plymouth, 2000, 2:29– 250.
  6. De Souza R., A. Ambrosini, L. Passaglia. Plant GrowthPromoting Bacteria as Inoculants in Agricultural Soils. Genetics and Molecular Biology. 2015, 38(4): 401–419.
  7. Duffy B., G. Défago, K. Duffy. Environmental Factors Modulating Antibiotic and Siderophore Biosynthesis by Pseudomonas Fluorescens Biocontrol Strains Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999, 65(6): 2429–38.
  8. Haas, D., G. Defago. Biological control of soil-borne pathogens by fluorescent pseudomonads, Nat Rev Microbiol. 2005, 3:307–319.
  9. Hashem A., B. Tabassum, E. Fathi Abd_Allah. Bacillus subtilis: A plant-growth promoting rhizobacterium that also impacts biotic stress Bacillus subtilis: A plant-growth promoting rhizobacterium, Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 2019.
  10. Kang S. M., R. Radhakrishnan, K. E. Lee, Y. H. You, J. H. Ko, J. H. Kim et al. Mechanism of plant growth promotion elicited by Bacillus sp. LKE15 in oriental melon. Acta Agric Scand Sect B Soil Plant Sci. 2015, 65:637–647.
  11. Mayak S., T. Tirosh, B. R. Glick. Plant growth-promoting bacteria confer resistance in tomato plants to salt stress. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2004, 42:565–573.
  12. McSpadden-Gardener B. B. Ecology of Bacillus and Paenibacillus spp. in agricultural systems. Phytopathology. 2004, 94(11):1252–1258.
  13. Nagesh M., P. Parvatha-Reddy. 2004. Biochemical changes in Glomus fasciculatum colonized roots of Lycopersicon esculentum in presence of Meloidogyne incognita. Indian J Exp Biol. 2004, 42:721–727.
  14. Panta G. R., D. S. NeSmith. A model for estimating area of muskmelon leaves, Hortscience. 1995, 30(3):624-625.
  15. Rillig M., D. Mummey. Mycorrhizas and soil structure. New Phytol. 2006, 171:41–53.
  16. Sonneveld C., J. Van Den Ende, P. A. Dijk. Analysis of growing media by means of a 1:1.5 volume extract. Soil Science and Pant Analysis. 1974, 5(3):183-202.
  17. Vessey J. Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria as Biofertilizers. Plant and soil. 2003, 255(2): 571–86.
  18. Vivas A., A. Marulanda, J. Ruiz-Lozano, J. Barea, R. Azcon. Influence of a Bacillus sp. on physiological activities of two arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and on plant responses to PEGinduced drought stress. Mycorrhiza. 2003, 13:249–256.
  19. Xie S. S., H. J. Wu, H. Y. Zang, L.M. Wu, Q. Q Zhu, X. W. Gao. Plant Growth Promotion by Spermidine-Producing Bacillus Subtilis OKB105. Molecular plant-microbe interactions. 2014, 27(7): 655–63.

Article full text

Download PDF