Mechanization in agriculture & Conserving of the resources
Vol. 69 (2025), Issue 1, pg(s) 3-5

MECHANIZATION IN AGRICULTURE

Sweetcorn grain production technology

  • 1 Department of Agricultural, Forest and Transport Machinery, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Poland
  • 2 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Moldova

Abstract

The presented research results concern the amount of work and energy incurred in the grain production technology and the aspect of the quality of separating grain from the cob cores. The dynamic increase in the area of sweet corn cultivation for processing purposes (canning, freezing) affects the fact that manual harvesting is increasingly being replaced by combine harvesting. It ensures higher and energy-efficient work efficiency, as well as harvesting at the optimal stage of ripeness, which is particularly important in the case of sweet corn. Sweet corn cobs of the Candle variety were harvested with a Bourgoin combine harvester at the stage of late-milk maturity, and then subjected to processing consisting in de-shirting and cutting off the grain The quality requirements of the separated grain are, m.in: smooth surface and equal length of the cut grains, no mechanical damage and low losses of weight and nutrients. The quality of the separated (cut) grain was analyzed by measuring the length and surface condition of the cut grain. Grain with weight losses was classified as grain of inferior quality. The grains were cut off on a cutter for variables ranging from 167.5 to 301.2 rad/s angular velocity of the knife head and constant linear speed of the cob feeder 0.31 m/s. For comparison purposes, grain is divided into three classes. The workload incurred for the combine cob harvesting was the highest for post-harvest processing of cobs – 31% and soil cultivation – 27%, and energy expenditures for soil cultivation – 341 kWh/ha and for combine harvesting – 285 kWh/ha. The length of the cut grain increased by 26% in class I, and decreased by 14% in class II and by 11% in class III. On the other hand, the share of grain of inferior quality decreased in class I by 5%, in class II by 7% and in class II by 3%.

Keywords

References

  1. Brecht J.K. 1998. Fresh cut sweet corn kernels. Citrus and Vegetable Magazine, 63(7), 36-37.
  2. Cartea M.E., Malvar R.A. 1996. Identification of field corn populations to improve sweet corn for Atlantic European Conditions; Crop Science no. 36, 1506-1512.
  3. Czarnecka A. 2024. Uprawa kukurydzy cukrowej – spotkanie w Radziejowie. https://hortinet.pl/uprawa-kukurydzy-cukrowej-spotkanie-w-radziejowie/
  4. Govindasamy R., Samulis R.J., Brumfield R.G. 1996. Production and marketing of sweet corn in New Jersy: Past and the present, Acta Horticulturae, 429, 205-211)
  5. Liu, R.J.; Boehlein, S.K.; Tracy, W.F.; Resende, M.E.R.; Hudalla, G.A. 2020. Characterizing the Physical Properties and Cell Compatibility of Phytoglycogen Extracted from Different Sweet Corn Varieties. Molecules, 25, 637.
  6. Kunicki E.2003. Uprawa kukurydzy cukrowej. Wyd. Plantpress, Kraków.
  7. Michalski T. 1996. Koszty i opłacalność uprawy kukurydzy cukrowej. Kukurydza – Wyd. spec. – Kukurydza cukrowa, 2(7): 21-22.
  8. Niedziółka I., Szymanek M. 2002. Wpływ warunków zbioru i przechowywania na jakość kolb kukurydzy cukrowej. Kukurydza, 2(20), 51-52.
  9. Niedziółka I., Szymanek M. 2001. Ocena technologii produkcji kolb kukurydzy cukrowej. Inżynieria Rolnicza, 9(29): 193-200.
  10. Nowak J., Niedziółka I., Szymanek M. 2001. Kombajny do zbioru kukurydzy cukrowej. Rolniczy Przegląd Techniczny, 7/8: 24.
  11. Revilla P., Anibas C.M., Tracy W.F. 2021.Sweet Corn Research around the World 2015–2020. Agronomy, 11, 534. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11030534
  12. Waligóra H., Dubas A., Swulińska-Katulska A. 1998. Kukurydza cukrowa. Wyd. Multum, Poznań.
  13. Hryhoriv Y., Butenko A., Masyk I., Onychko T., Davydenko G., Bondarieva L., HotvianskaA., Horbunova K., Yevtushenko Y., Mykola V. 2023. Growth and Development of Sweet Corn Plants in the Agro-Ecological Conditions of the Western Region of Ukraine. Ecological Engineering & Environmental Technology, 24(4), 216–222 https://doi.org/10.12912/27197050/162699

Article full text

Download PDF