Security & Future
Vol. 3 (2019), Issue 4, pg(s) 128-131

THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS OF SECURITY

COMPERATVE EVALUATION OF MODELING AND SIMULATION TECHNIQUES FOR INTERDEPENDENT CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE

  • 1 Institute of Metal Science Equipment and Technologies with Hydroaerodynamics Centre “Acad. A Balevski” Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria

Abstract

There are numerous methodical approaches to model, numerically analyses or/and simulate single systems’ behavior. However, modeling interdependencies between different systems (so called system-of-systems) and to describe their complex behavior, necessarily by simulation, is still an unresolved issue.

Keywords

References

  1. Critical Foundations: Protecting America’s Infrastructures, Report of the President’s Commission on Critical Infrastructure Protection, Washing-ton D.C., 1997;
  2. Eusgeld, I., Kröger, W., Sansaviini, G., Schläpfer, M., Zio, E.“ Investigations on the role of network analysis and agent-based modeling within a framework for the vulnerability analysis of critical infrastructures” (working paper). 5. Juni 2008 48/50;
  3. Panevski V., Competence centres and intelligent security systems in Bulgaria, International Scientific Journal “Security & Future”, YEAR III, ISSUE 1, НТС по машиностроене, 2019, ISBN:WEB ISSN 2535-082X, 14-16 2019;
  4. Department of Homeland Security. “National Infrastructure Protection Plan”, DHS, (2006);
  5. Georgiev Nikolai, "Quality indicators for protection systems", International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, vol VI, issue 4, ISSN 2348-0386, 2018,p.836-842;
  6. S. Rinaldi, “Modeling and Simulating Critical Infrastructures and Their Interdependencies”, Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Cconference on System Science. Hawaii, (2004);
  7. S. Panzieri, R. Setola, and G. Ulivi. “An approach to model complex in-terdependent infrastructures”, Universita "Roma Tre", Roma. (2005);
  8. S. Lee “A frame work for supporting bottom up ontology evolution for discovery and description of Grid services”. Expert systems with Applications, 32(2):pp.376-385, (2007);
  9. V. Temnenco. “Software Estimation”, Enterprise-Wide. (2007);
  10. S. Rinaldi, J. Peerenboom and S. Kelly “Critical Infrastructure Interdependencies”, IEE Control Systems Magazine, (2001);
  11. R.J. Ellison, N.R. Mead, T. A. Longstaff and R. C. Linger. ,, The Survivability Imperative: Protecting Critical Systems”, The Journal of Defense Software Engineering, (2000);
  12. I. Dobson, B. Carreras, V. Lynch and D.E. Newman. ,, Complex systems analysis of series of blackouts: cascading failure, criticality, and self-organization”, Bulk Power System and Control, Cortina d' Ampezzo, Italy, (2004);
  13. F.M. Marshall, D. M. Rasmuson and A. Mosleh. “Common Cause Failure Data Collection and Analysis System”, 1, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, NUREG/CR-6268, (1998);
  14. Georgiev Nikolai, "Quality criteria for critical infrastructure protection systems", International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, vol VI, issue VI, ISSN 2348-0386, 2018, p. 265- 271;
  15. Borshchev, A., Y. Karpov, and V. Kharitonov, Distributed simulation of hybrid systems with AnyLogic and HLA. Future Generation Computer Systems, 2002. 18(6): p. 829-839 (2002).

Article full text

Download PDF