TECHNOLOGICAL BASIS OF “INDUSTRY 4.0”

DETERMINATION OF INDUSTRY 4.0 COMPLIANCE CRITERIA FOR BAND SAW MACHINES

  • 1 Beka-Mak Machinery Industry and Trade Inc. R & D Center, Bursa, Turkey
  • 2 Gazi University, Technology Faculty, Manufacturing Engineering Department, Ankara, Turkey

Abstract

Production starts with supply of raw materials and cutting of this input to the desired dimensions in order to be taken to the production line. Sawing machines used to bring the raw material to the desired dimensions in the industrial manufacturing companies are of great importance and maintain the identity of being the indispensable machine tool of almost all the enterprises’ machine parks. Considering the transition to Industry 4.0 in next 10-15 years, Turkey, which has a significant market share in the production of sawing machines, still needs to be sustainable export to countries like EU Countries and the United States which have the highest level of preparation for Industry 4.0 is directly related to meeting the expectations of these countries. In this study, for both of to raise the level of preparedness and to increase the export potential of Turkey, it is aimed to determine which criteria should be taken as basis in the development of saw machines capable of meeting industry 4.0 requirements. As a result of the evaluation, to meet Industry 4.0 requirements it have been come fore to meet the needs such as adaptation of processing and cutting conditions with barcode data, optimization of cutting conditions by data analysis, remote monitoring and control by communication with desktop and mobile devices, real-time tracking for predictive maintenance and apply maintenance plan in concept of dark factories.

Keywords

References

  1. J. Qin, Y. Liu, R. Grosvenor, A Categorical Framework of Manufacturing for Industry 4.0 and Beyond, Changeable, Agile, Reconfigurable & Virtual Production, Procedia CIRP 52 (2016) 173 – 178.
  2. M. Rüßmann, M. Lorenz, P. Gerbert, M. Waldner, Industry 4.0: The Future of Productivity and Growth in Manufacturing Industries, (April 09, 2015) 1-14.
  3. R. Neugebauer, S. Hippmann, M. Leis, M. Landherr, Industrie 4.0- Form the perspective of apllied research, 49th CIRP conference on Manufacturing systems (CIRP-CMS 2016), 2-7.
  4. K.D. Thoben, S. Wiesner, T. Wuest , Industrie 4.0 and Smart Manufacturing- A Review of Research Issues and Application Examples, International Journal of Automation and TechnologyVol.11 No.1, 2017 4-16.
  5. K. Sipsas, K. Alexopoulos, V. Xanthakis, G. Chryssolouris, Collaborative maintenance in flow-line manufacturing environments: An Industry 4.0 approach, 5th CIRP Global Web Conference Research and Innovation for Future Production, Procedia CIRP 55 (2016) 236 – 241.
  6. F. Rennung, C.T. Luminosu, A. Draghici, Service Provision in the Framework of Industry 4.0, SIM 2015 / 13th International Symposium in Management, Procedia - Social and Behavioural Sciences 221 ( 2016 ) 372 – 377.
  7. M. Brettel, N. Friederichsen, M. Keller, How Virtualization, Decentralization and Network Building Change the Manufacturing Landscape: An Industry 4.0 Perspective, International Journal of Mechanical, Aerospace, Industrial, Mechatronic and Manufacturing Engineering Vol:8, No:1, 2014, 37-36.
  8. Wieland, Industry 4.0 - Ready For Modular, Flexible And Networked Production, Wieland Electric GmbH, 2017, 2.
  9. Industry 4.0: Definition, Design Principles, Challenges, and the Future of Employment, https://www.cleverism.com/industry-4-0, 15th Nov. 2019
  10. Industry 4.0 Compatible, High Efficiency Horizontal Sawing Machine Design and Prototype Production, TEYDEB, 2019

Article full text

Download PDF