Identification of possible cheating on computer-based exams.

  • 1 Faculty of Information Technology, Polytechnic University of Tirana


In this paper we will explain a solution to identify the users which poetically are trying to cheat the computer-based exam. Nowadays, the online exams are very useful to identify the people with right knowledge to do a job or to certificate them based on their knowledge. One of the major concerns for the organization of computer-based exams is the potential for cheating in collaboration with employee responsible of monitoring or due to the lack of human invigilation. The proposed solution will analyze in real-time the behavior of student and will alert the monitoring employee for suspicious activity of any exam.



  4. Alakyleh, A. S. (2018). Evaluating the comparability of (PPT) (CBT) by implementing the compulsory Islamic Culture Course Test in the University of Jordan. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 5(1), 176-186. DOI: 10.21449/ijate.370494.
  5. Al-Amri, S. (2009). Computer-Based Testing vs. Paper-Based Testing: Establishing the Comparability of Reading Tests through the Revolution of a New Comparability Model in a Saudi EFL Context. Unpublished Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics thesis. Colchester: University of Essex.
  6. Boevé, A. J., Meijer, R. R, Albers, C. J, Beetsma, Y., & Bosker, R. J. (2015). Introducing computer-based testing in high-stakes exams in higher education: results of a field experiment. PLOS ONE, 10(12) e0143616. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0143616.
  7. Daniels, L. M., & Gierl, M. J. (2017). The impact of immediate test score reporting on university students’ achievement emotions in the context of computer-based multiple-choice exams. Learning, and Instruction, 52, 27-35.
  8. Jeong, H. (2014). A comparative study of scores on computer-based tests and paper-based tests. Behavior & Information Technology, 33(4), 410-422.
  9. Khoshsima, H., & Hashemi Toroujeni, S. M. (2017b). Comparability of Computer-Based Testing and Paper-Based Testing: Testing mode effect, testing mode order, computer attitudes and testing mode preference. International Journal of Computer (IJC), 24(1), 80-99.
  10. Mastuti, E., & Handoyo, S. (2017). Effects of individual differences on the performance in computer-based test (CBT). Advances in Social Science, Education, and Humanities Research: Proceedings of the 3rd ASEAN Conference on Psychology, Counselling, and Humanities (ACPCH, 2017). Malang: University of Muhammadiyah.
  11. Al-Qdah, M., Ababneh, I., 2017. Comparing Online and Paper Exams: Performances and Perceptions of Saudi Students. International Journal of Information and Education Technology. 7(2):106
  12. Al-Saleem, Saleh, M., 2016. A Comperehensive Analysis and Evaluation of Computer-based Testing Tools. Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 9(28)
  13. Kuyoro, S.O., Maminor, G.U., Kanu, R.U., & Akande, O. 2016. The Design and Implementation of a Computer Based Testing System. Journal of Applied Computation.
  14. Singh, SK., Tiwari, AK., 2016. Design and implementation of secure computer-based examination system based on b/s structure. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research.
  15. Thurlow, M., Lazarus, S.S., Albus, D., & Hodgson, J. 2010. Computer-based testing: Practices and considerations (Synthesis Report 78). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.

Article full text

Download PDF