Industry 4.0
Vol. 8 (2023), Issue 5, pg(s) 178-181

SOCIETY & ”INDUSTRY 4.0”

Intellectual factor of the new economy: Formation features

  • 1 Grodno State Agrarian University1 – Grodno, Belarus
  • 2 Yanka Kupala Grodno State University2 – Grodno, Belarus

Abstract

The new economy requires the creation of a methodology for training a new type of worker – a “knowledge worker”, whose activities will ensure the innovative development of business entities and social security of workers for a comfortable and safe life. An innovatively receptive specialist with pronounced creative thinking during the formation of a new economy and its subsequent sustainable functioning with a characteristic vector of social development has the intellectual potential for the development and practical use of highly effective innovations that ensure the achievement of strategic goals declared at the state level. To form such a specialist, it is necessary to transform methodological approaches to the intellectual support of educational processes, professional activities and advanced training based on the concept of “lifelong education” (“education through life”).
The features of the functioning and development of the domestic education system in the context of the requirements of the state strategy for sustainable economic development are considered. The need to improve methodological approaches to the educational process with an increase in research and socio-humanitarian components is shown. Education in all forms of its manifestation like as a target process or self-learning is a systemic process in which professional skills and abilities are an important, but not a determining component of a harmonious member of society, which, through its activities, contributes to its progressive development. The fundamental goal of education is to form a harmonious personality, in which the talents laid down at the gene level are manifested and developed to the full extent in adequate accordance with moral criteria based on universal human values and national mentality.

Keywords

References

  1. The National Strategy for Sustainable Development for the Period to 2020 of the Republic of Belarus, Minsk (2004).
  2. The National Strategy for Sustainable Development for the Period to 2030 of the Republic of Belarus, Minsk (2015).
  3. A. Lazarevich (2014). The horizons of technosocium, The Science and Innovations, 3(133), 22–28. (in Russian).
  4. A. Miroshnichenko (2014). Systems of enterprises continuous improvement based on knowledge management, The Science and Innovations, 2(132), 55–60. (in Russian).
  5. Yu.S. Solodovnikov (2019). Modern structural policy of the Republic of Belarus in terms of Eurasian economic integration, Business. Innovation. Economy, 3, 17–25. (in Russian).
  6. A. Shumilin (2014). Formation of the backbone interactions in the innovative development of economy, The Science and Innovations, 7(137), 29–34. (in Russian).
  7. L. Vainshtein (2014). Scientific support of the human factor in various technological structures, The Science and Innovations, 7(137), 8–12. (in Russian).
  8. V. Baynev (2017). The fourth industrial revolution as a global innovative project, The Science and Innovations, 3, 38–41. (in Russian).
  9. M.V. Kovalchuk, O.S. Naraikin and E.B. Yatsishina (2012). Convergence of science and technology and creation of new noosphere, Nanotechnologies in Russia, 7, 1–5. (in Russian).
  10. Ya.P. Hilo, V.V. Goncharov (2013). Directions of intensification of innovative development of the Republic of Belarus in the conditions of formation of innovative economy, Bulletin of the Gomel State Technical University named after P.O. Sukhoi, 3, 117–123. (in Russian).
  11. B.N. Panshin (2019). Genesis and hierarchy of key concepts in the digital economy, Business. Innovation. Economy, 3, 142–146. (in Russian).
  12. B. Melnikas, et al. (2013). The Knowledge Economy: Internationalization and Systematics of Innovation, Lithuanian Innovation Center, Vilnius. (in Russian).
  13. I. Nonaka and H. Takeuchi (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation, Oxford University Press, New York.
  14. O.V. Avdeychik, L.P. Nehorosheva, V.A. Struk (2016). Fundamentals of scientific and innovative activities, Law and Economics, Minsk. (in Russian).
  15. A.D. Korol (2015). Dialogueization of education as a guarantor of the success of society, Problems of management. Ser. A and B., 2, 155–159. (in Russian).
  16. A.G. Shrubenko (2016). The flagship of management education: the path of innovative development in a quarter of a century, Ser. A and B., 1(58), 6–16. (in Russian).
  17. O.V. Avdeychik, G.A. Khatskevich, V.A. Struk, L.N. Nehorosheva (2019). Fundamentals of innovative activity of industrial enterprises, GrSU, Hrodna. (in Russian).
  18. Ch.S. Kirvel (2012). Socio-humanitarian knowledge and education in the context of modern information wars and the global
  19. competition, Journal of the Belarusian State University. Sociology, 2, 79–91. (in Russian).
  20. Ch.S. Kirvel, S.Z. Semernik, Modernization of education: a miser pays twice, Belaruskaia dumka, P. 1, 8, 60–65 (2012); P. 2, 9, 69–75 (2012). (in Russian).
  21. E.E. Golovchanskaya, L.S. Shakhovskaya (2019). Intellectual needs as a marketing category, Business. Innovation. Economy, 3, 184–189. (in Russian).
  22. V. Shumilin (2014). Consumer-Driven Innovation: The Web X.O Phenomenon, Science and Innovations, 12(142), 24–25. (in Russian).
  23. Yu. Pravik (2013). Marketing methods in the implementation of state strategies for innovative development, Science and Innovations, 7(125), 48–51. (in Russian).
  24. G. Sokolova (2013). Modernization as a technological and social phenomenon: Belarus – Russia, Science and Innovations, 6(124), 24–28. (in Russian).
  25. G.A. Khatskevich, N.G. Zabrodskaya (2019). Socio-economic factors that justify the actual changes of administrative and territorial division of the Republic of Belarus, Business. Innovation. Economy, 3, 7–16. (in Russian).
  26. Yu.V. Meleshko (2019). Ontological nature of the economy of neoindustrial production, Business. Innovation. Economy, 3, 49– 57. (in Russian).
  27. Ch.S. Kirvel (2018). Modern education «in the clutches» of liberal market extremism, Journal of the Belarusian State University. Sociology, 4, 88–96. (in Russian).
  28. N.V. Smirnova (2015). Academic literacy and writing in the university: from theory to practice, Higher education in Russia. 6. 58–64. (in Russian).
  29. D.G. Dobrorodny (2019). Distance learning as a global perspective and challenge for a classical university, Higher school, 5, 36–39. (in Russian).
  30. I.B. Strelkova (2019). Expert assessment of the originality of scientific works with the help of the "Antiplagiat" system in the structure of the formation of academic literacy of young researchers, Higher school, 5, 3–7. (in Russian).
  31. L.V. Prokhorova (2019). The image of higher school teacher in the context of intercultural interaction, Vysheishaya shkola, 5, 18–21. (in Russian).
  32. L.Yu. Donskaya (2004). Psychological conditions of forming the image of a high school teacher, Dis. … kand. psikhol. nauk, Stavropol, 212. (in Russian).
  33. K. Titayev (2012). From what Russian universities become "fence-building institutions", Domestic notes, 2, 1–12. (in Russian).
  34. L. Yu. Shilin, A. A. Navrotsky, L. S. Strigalev (2019). Modern aspects of intellectualization of educational technologies, Higher school, 1, 25–26. (in Russian).
  35. V. V. Tsepkalo (2013). HTP: high technologies of education, Science and Innovations, 7, 57–59. (in Russian).
  36. E. T. Polupanova (2020). Evaluation by students of university teachers: world experience, Higher school, 1, 41–44. (in Russian).

Article full text

Download PDF