Innovations
Vol. 8 (2020), Issue 2, pg(s) 60-62

INNOVATION POLICY AND INNOVATION MANAGEMENT

Innovative forms for certificating graduates of professional retraining programs: a comparative analysis of the performance

  • 1 Novosibirsk State Technical University, Novosibirsk, Russia
  • 2 Siberian State University of Telecommunications and Information Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia

Abstract

The demand of the industry and employees for training forms and the content of educational programs is being transformed. Upto-date and advanced knowledge is required, as well as flexible skills, and quick ways to master them. The request becomes particularly relevant in the case of professional retraining programs. The traditional format of final certification includes tools that simulate a locally limited situation of activity. In this way, it is difficult to identify the formation of competencies for a wider set of functional tasks. This difficulty can be overcome by introducing a new certification tool – a simulator that simulates the working day of a specialist during which he implements a wide list of functional responsibilities, fixed in the job regulations. The purpose of the article is to evaluate the results of using a professional activity simulator as a means of diagnosing the level of professional readiness. It contains evidence of the feasibility of switching to the use of the simulator for the final certification of HR specialists.

Keywords

References

  1. Ashurst N., Rout C., Rocke D., Gouws E. Use of a mechanical simulator for training in applying cricoid pressure // British Journal of Anaesthesia. 1996. pp.468- 472.
  2. Bennett S.A. Aviation crew resource management – a critical appraisal, in the tradition of reflective practice, informed by flight and cabin crew feedback // Journal of Risk Research. 2019, VOL. 22, №11, pp. 1357-1373. DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2018.1459800.
  3. Colombo S., Golzio L. The Plant Simulator as viable means to prevent and manage risk through competencies management: Experiment results // Safety Science. 2016. Vol.84. pp. 46-56. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.11.021.
  4. Cooper J. B., Taqueti V.R. A brief history of the development of mannequin simulators for clinical education and training // Qual Saf Health Care. 2004; Vol. 13. DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2004.009886.
  5. Drozdova M., Rapant P., Malerova L. Support system for the training of crisis management group members // WIT Transactions on The Built Environment. 2014. Vol 134. pp. 247-255. DOI:10.2495/SAFE130231.
  6. Druzhinina O., Hvannberg E.T. Feedback in a Training Simulator for Crisis Management Compared to Feedback
  7. in a Real-Life Exercise. // Human Work Interaction Design Work Analysis and HCI Third IFIP WG 13.6 Working Conference, HWID 2012 Copenhagen, pp. 124- 138. DOI:10.1007/978-3-642-41145-8_11.
  8. Giuliani M., Gillan C., Wong O., Harnett N., Milne E., Moseley D., Thompson R. Evaluation of high-fidelity simulation training in radiation oncology using an outcomes logic model // Radiation Oncology . 2014. Vol.9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-9-189
  9. Hreniuc V., Batrinca G. A Pleading for Ship Manned Models as a “Physical” Simulator in the Ship Handling Training Process // 24th DAAAM International Symposium on Intelligent Manufacturing and Automation, 2013. pp. 1410-1419.
  10. Lisitsyna L.S., Smetyuh N.P., Golikov S.P. Models and Methods for Adaptive Management of Individual and Team-Based Training Using a Simulator // International Conference on Recent Trends in Physics. (ICRTP2016. Conference Series. 2016. DOI: 10.1088/1742- 6596/755/1/011001.
  11. Napoli A.M. Practitioner application: Policy Flight Simulators: Accelerating Decisions to Adopt Evidence- Based Health Interventions // Journal of Healthcare Management. 2019. VOL. 64(4), pp. 241-242. DOI: 10.1097/JHM-D-19-00104.
  12. Otsuki M., Akiyoshi M., Samejima M. Identification Method of Improvements in User Operations on Project Manager Skill-Up Simulator // IEEE Access. VOL.5. 2017. Pp.5811-5818. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2673019.
  13. Querrec R., Buche C., Maffre E., Chevaillier P. Multiagents systems for virtual environment for training. Application to fire-fighting // International Journal of Computers and Applications Vol.1, №1. 2004. pp. 25-34.
  14. Saastamoinena K., Rissanena A., Linnervuo R. Usage of simulators to boost marine corps learning // 23rd International Conference on Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Information & Engineering Systems. Procedia Computer Science. 159 (2019). pp. 1011–1018. DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.268.
  15. Staroverova N.A., Shustrova M.L. Zatsarinnaya Yu. N. The development of rolling-stock virtual simulator // Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 1399 (2019). DOI:10.1088/1742-6596/1399/4/044025.
  16. Trinh T.-H., Buche C., Querrec R., Tisseau J. Modeling of errors realized by a human learner in virtual environment for training // International Journal of Computers, Communications & Control. Vol. IV. 2009. №.1, pp. 73- 81.
  17. Zelentsov L.B., Mayilyan L.D., Shogenov M.S. Organizational and technological simulation of the construction organization activity in the complex infrastructure projects implementation // IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2019. 698. DOI:10.1088/1757-899X/698/7/077048.
  18. Zhang Y., Zhao X., Liu X.，Li H., Pan Z. A Smart Substation Training Platform based on Primary Equipment Simulator // IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 310 (2019). DOI:10.1088/1755- 1315/310/3/032

Article full text

Download PDF