Effect of structure and texture on the mechanical characteristics of magnesium alloys processed by equal-channel angular pressing

  • 1 A.A. Baikov Institute of Metallurgy and Materials Science of RAS, Moscow, Russia; National University of Science and Technology "MISIS", Moscow, Russia
  • 2 A.A. Baikov Institute of Metallurgy and Materials Science of RAS, Moscow, Russia
  • 3 Ufa State Aviation Technical University, Ufa, Russia
  • 4 Department of Materials Engineering, Monash University, Clayton, Australia; Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Australia


ECAP was carried out with a gradual decrease in temperature and an increase in the number of passes on two medical magnesium alloys: WE43 (Mg-3.56%Y-2.20%Nd-0.47%Zr) and ZX10 (Mg-1.0%Zn-0.3%Ca). It was shown that ECAP leads to a significant refinement of the alloys structure. For ZX10 alloy, the average grain size after ECAP decreased from ~ 105 μm in the initial state to 8 ± 0.18 μm in the longitudinal section and to 4 ± 0.19 μm in the transverse one. For the WE43 alloy, the average grain size was changed from 70 μm to 0.69 ± 0.13 μm and the precipitation of particles of the Mg41Nd5 phase with an average size of 0.45 ± 0.18 μm was also discovered. At the same time, the grain refinement led to an increase in the strength characteristics of the both alloys (including fatigue strength), and increased prismatic slip activity (along with the formation of an inclined basal texture in ZX10 alloy) led to an increase in their ductility. The alloy structure formed during the ECAP process does not lead to a decreasing in resistance to chemical corrosion.



  1. Y. Chen, Z. Xu, C. Smith et al. Recent advances on the development of magnesium alloys for biodegradable implants: Review // Acta Biomater., 2014, 10, 4561-4573.
  2. X. Li, X. Liu, S. Wu et al. Design of magnesium alloys with controllable degradation for biomedical implants: From bulk to surface // Acta Biomater., 2016, 45, 2–30.
  3. A. Atrens, M. Liu, N.I.Z. Abidin. Co1rrosion mechanism applicable to biodegradable magnesium implants // Mater. Sci. Eng. B, 2011, 176, 1609–1636.
  4. Z. Li, X. Gu, S. Lou et al. The development of binary Mg–Ca alloys for use as biodegradable materials within bone // Biomaterials, 2008, 29(10), 1329–1344.
  5. X.N. Gu, N. Li, Y.F. Zheng et al. In vitro degradation performance and biological response of a Mg–Zn–Zr alloy // Mater. Sci. Eng. B, 2011, 176(20), 1778–1784.
  6. N.A. Agha, Z, Liu, F. Feyerabend et al. The effect of osteoblasts on the surface oxidation processes of biodegradable Mg and Mg-Ag alloys studied by synchrotron IR microspectroscopy // Mater. Sci. Eng. C, 2018, 91, 659–668
  7. S. S. Nene, B. P. Kashyap, N. Prabhu et al. Biocorrosion and biodegradation behavior of ultralight Mg–4Li–1Ca (LC41) alloy in simulated body fluid for degradable implant applications // J. Mater. Sci., 2015, 50(8), 3041–3050.
  8. Y. Li, C. Wen, D. Mushahary et al. Mg–Zr–Sr alloys as biodegradable implant materials // Acta Biomater., 2012, 8(8), 3177–3188.
  9. L. Xu, G. Yu, E. Zhang et al. In vivo corrosion behavior of Mg– Mn–Zn alloy for bone implant application // J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 2007, 83A(3), 703–711.
  10. F. Witte, V. Kaese, H. Switzer et al. In vivo corrosion of four magnesium alloys and the associated bone response // Biomaterials, 2005, 26, 3557–3563.
  11. R. Waksman, R. Pakala, P.K. Kuchulakanti et al. Safety and efficacy of bioabsorbable magnesium alloy stents in porcine coronary arteries // Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv., 2006, 68, 607–617.
  12. I. Marco, A. Myrissa, E. Martinelli et al. In vivo and in vitro degradation comparison of pure Mg, Mg-10Gd and Mg-2Ag: a short term study // Eur. Cell Mater., 2017, 33, 90–104.
  13. R.Z. Valiev, A.P. Zhilyaev, T.G. Langdon. Bulk nanostructured materials: fundamentals and applications. Wiley, Hoboken, 2014.
  14. R.Z. Valiev, R.K. Islamgaliev, I.V. Alexandrov. Bulk nanostructured materials from severe plastic deformation // Prog. Mater. Sci., 2000, 45, 103–189.
  15. P. Minárik, R. Král, M. Janeček. Effect of ECAP processing on corrosion resistance of AE21 and AE42 magnesium alloys // Appl. Surf. Sci., 2013, 281, 44-48
  16. E. Mostaed, M. Hashempour, A. Fabrizi et.al. Microstructure, texture evolution, mechanical properties and corrosion behavior of ECAP processed ZK60 magnesium alloy for biodegradable applications // J. Mech. Behav. Biomed., 2014, 37, 307-322
  17. T.I. Savyolova, S.F. Kourtasov. ODF restoration by orientation grid // Mater. Sci.Forum, 2005, 459-457, 301-306.
  18. V.N. Serebryany, L.L. Rokhlin, A.N. Monina. Texture and anisotropy of mechanical properties of the magnesium alloy of Mg-Y-Gd-Zr system // Inorganic Materials: Applied Research, 2014, 5(2), 116-123.
  19. J. Groebner. Magnesium – Neodymium – Yttrium, in: G. Effenberg, F. Aldinger, P. Rogl (Eds.), A comprehensive compendium of evaluated constitutional data and phase diagrams, Volume 18, Stuttgart, 2001, 324-335.
  20. S.R. Agnew, J.A. Horton, T.M. Lillo et al. Enhanced ductility in strongly textured magnesium produced by equal channel angular processing // Scr. Mater., 2004, 50, 377–381.
  21. P. Minárik, J. Veselý, R. Král et al. Exceptional mechanical properties of ultra-fine grain Mg-4Y-3RE alloy processed by ECAP // Mater.Sci.Eng. A, 2017, 708, 193–198.
  22. J.-F. Nie. Precipitation and Hardening in Magnesium Alloys // Metall. Mater. Trans., 2012, 43A(11), 3891-3939.

Article full text

Download PDF