TECHNOLOGIES

Development of Software Application in the Evaluation of Erythrocyte Aggregation Studied with Microfluidic Device

  • 1 Dept. of Mechatronics, Institute of Mechanics, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria; Center of Competence at Mechatronics and Clean Technologies – MIRACle, Sofia, Bulgaria
  • 2 Institute of Biophysics and Biomedical Engineering, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria; University Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital “Maichin Dom”, Sofia, Bulgaria
  • 3 Center of Competence at Mechatronics and Clean Technologies – MIRACle, Sofia, Bulgaria; Institute of Biophysics and Biomedical Engineering, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria

Abstract

The main focus of this research is on the elaboration of the combined experimental approach and image analysis (based on the specialized software environments) to the research of erythrocyte aggregation, which is evaluated by the microfluidic device BioFlux. To realize a precise evaluation of the erythrocyte aggregation index based on the obtained, during the experiment images, are applied image processing toolbox from ImageJ and an elaborated computer program in IntelliJ IDEA (integrated development environment) as well. The obtained results for the index of erythrocyte aggregation, based on the developed methodology, show a statistically significant difference between the two studied groups with preeclampsia and healthy pregnant women.

Keywords

References

  1. UK Health Departments. The Future of the Healthcare Science Workforce. Modernising Scientific Careers: The Next Steps (2008).
  2. Subject Benchmark Statement: Biomedical Sciences. The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (2015).
  3. M. Kota(ed). Bioimage Data Analysis, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Boschstr. 12, 69469 Weinheim, Germany, (2016).
  4. J. Schindelin, I. Arganda-Carreras, E. Frise, et al. Nat Methods 9(7):676–682 (2012).
  5. http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/
  6. F. de Chaumont, S. Dallongeville, N. Chenouard, et al. Icy: an open bioimage informatics platform for extended reproducible research. Nat Methods 9, 690–696 (2012).
  7. icy.bioimageanalysis.org
  8. A. E. Carpenter, T. R. Jones, M. R. Lamprecht, et al. Cell Profiler: image analysis software for identifying and quantifying cell phenotypes. Genome Biol 7(10):R100 (2006).
  9. www.cellprofiler.org
  10. https://www.mathworks.com/products/image.html
  11. http://www.ni .com/labview
  12. https://www.jetbrains.com/idea/
  13. B. Fan, F. Zhou, H. Han. Medical image enhancement based on modified lut-mapping derivative and multi-scale layer contrast modification. 4th Int. Cong. on Image and Signal Processing 2, 696-703 (2011).
  14. P. Gyawali, D. Ziegler, J. F. Cailhier, et al. Quantitative Measurement of Erythrocyte Aggregation as a Systemic Inflammatory Marker by Ultrasound Imaging: A Systematic Review. Ultrasound Med Biol. 44(7):1303-1317 (2018).
  15. C. Echeverria, F. Eltit, J. F. Santibanez, et al. Endothelial dysfunction in pregnancy metabolic disorders. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. 1;1866(2):165414 (2020).
  16. B. Csiszar, G. Galos, S. Funke, et al. Peripartum Investigation of Red Blood Cell Properties in Women Diagnosed with Early-Onset Preeclampsia. Cells, 10, 2714 (2021).
  17. O. K. Baskurt, H. J. Meiselman. Erythrocyte Aggregation: Basic Aspects and Clinical Importance. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 53(1-2):23-37 (2013).
  18. E. Kaliviotis. Mechanics of the Red Blood Cell Network. Journal of Cellular Biotech, 1 (1), 37-43, (2015).
  19. B. Almog, R. Gamzu, R. Almog, et al. Enhanced erythrocyte aggregation in clinically diagnosed pelvic inflammatory disease. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 32(8):484-6 (2005).
  20. G. V. Grigorev, A. V. Lebedev, X. Wang, et al. Advances in Microfluidics for Single Red Blood Cell Analysis. Biosensors, 13, 117 (2023).
  21. M. Stroobach, L. Haya, M. Fenech. Effects of red blood cell aggregation on microparticle wall adhesion in circular microchannels. Med. Eng. Phys., 69, 100–108 (2019).
  22. Y. J. Kang. Microfluidic-based effective monitoring of blood by measuring RBC aggregation and blood viscosity under stepwise varying shear rates. Korea Aust. Rheol. J., 32, 15–27 (2020).
  23. R. Mehri, C. Mavriplis, M. Fenech. Controlled microfluidic environment for dynamic investigation of red blood cell aggregation. J. Vis. Exp. (100):e52719 (2015).
  24. C. G. Conant, M. A. Schwartz, J. E. Beecher, et al. Well plate microfluidic system for investigation of dynamic platelet behavior under variable shear loads. Biotechnol Bioeng 108: 2978 2987 (2011).
  25. T. Ridler, S. Calvard. Picture Thresholding Using an Iterative Selection Method. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 8(8), 630–632 (1978).
  26. G. Mchedlishvili, N. Beritashvili, D. Lominadze, B. Tsinamdzvrishvili. Technique for direct and quantitative evaluation of erythrocyte aggregability in blood samples. Biorheology. 30(2):153-61, (1993).
  27. E. Kaliviotis, J. Dusting, JM Sherwood, S. Balabani. Quantifying local characteristics of velocity, aggregation and hematocrit of human erythrocytes in a microchannel flow. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 63(2):123-48 (2015).
  28. D. Lăcătuşu, ID. Căruntu, V. Rusu. Study on erythrocyte aggregation using computerized image analysis methods. Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi. 117(3):801-5, (2013).

Article full text

Download PDF