Machines. Technologies. Materials.
Vol. 18 (2024), Issue 8, pg(s) 257-261

TECHNOLOGIES

Recycled Polypropylene filament: process optimization for 100 per cent recycled FDM material, optimizing properties and printing techniques

  • 1 Kaunas University of Technology, Kaunas, Lithuania

Abstract

The growing environmental concern about plastic waste has prompted research into sustainable recycling of polymer, particularly for widely used polymers such as polyethylene from the spools used in the textile industry in the second half of the 20th century. This study investigates the feasibility and optimization of recycling Polypropylene to make filaments suited for 3D printing applications, notably Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM). The study is divided into three phases: collecting and preparing post-consumer Polypropylene spools, extruding recycled Polypropylene into filaments, and optimizing the filament for 3d printing using FDM Technology.
Polyethylene spools are cleaned, shredded, and treated to ensure consistent feedstock quality. The extrusion process entailed controlling factors like temperature, screw speed, and cooling rate to produce filaments with constant diameter with less distortion. Following material characterisation, the printability of recycled Polypropylene filaments was evaluated using an FDM 3D printer. The Taguchi method is used to carefully study the influence of printing parameters such as nozzle temperature, bed temperature, print speed, and layer height to determine optimal parameters. The printed examples showed reasonable dimensional accuracy and layer adhesion, with surface roughness values within acceptable limits for practical applications.
This thorough study plan focuses on recycled Polypropylene as a feasible and sustainable material for FDM 3D printing. The findings indicate that with proper optimization, recycled Polypropylene can match the performance requirements of a variety of applications, helping to reduce waste and promote the circular economy in additive manufacturing. Long-term performance testing and the development of recycling processes will be the primary focus of future research to improve the material’s characteristics and broaden its application range.

Keywords

References

  1. K. Mikula et al., “3D printing filament as a second life of waste plastics—a review,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 12321–12333, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1007/S11356-020-10657-8/FIGURES/3.
  2. W. Xu et al., “3D printing for polymer/particle-based processing: A review,” Compos B Eng, vol. 223, p. 109102, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1016/J.COMPOSITESB.2021.109102.
  3. D. Stoof and K. Pickering, “Sustainable composite fused deposition modelling filament using recycled pre-consumer polypropylene,” Compos B Eng, vol. 135, pp. 110–118, Feb. 2018, doi: 10.1016/J.COMPOSITESB.2017.10.005.
  4. N. Vidakis et al., “Sustainable Additive Manufacturing: Mechanical Response of Polypropylene over Multiple Recycling Processes,” Sustainability 2021, Vol. 13, Page 159, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 159, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.3390/SU13010159.
  5. A. Spirio, R. Arrigo, A. Frache, L. Tuccinardi, and R. Tuffi, “Plastic waste recycling in additive manufacturing: Recovery of polypropylene from WEEE for the production of 3D printing filaments,” J Environ Chem Eng, vol. 12, no. 3, p. 112474, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.1016/J.JECE.2024.112474.
  6. F. A. Cruz Sanchez, H. Boudaoud, M. Camargo, and J. M. Pearce, “Plastic recycling in additive manufacturing: A systematic literature review and opportunities for the circular economy,” J Clean Prod, vol. 264, p. 121602, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2020.121602.
  7. I. F. Ituarte, O. Wiikinkoski, and A. Jansson, “Additive manufacturing of polypropylene: A screening design of experiment using laser-based powder bed fusion,” Polymers (Basel), vol. 10, no. 12, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.3390/POLYM10121293.
  8. M. Spoerk, C. Holzer, and J. Gonzalez-Gutierrez, “Material extrusion-based additive manufacturing of polypropylene: A review on how to improve dimensional inaccuracy and warpage,” J Appl Polym Sci, vol. 137, no. 12, p. 48545, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.1002/APP.48545.
  9. M. A. Sarabia-Vallejos, F. E. Rodríguez-Umanzor, C. M. González-Henríquez, and J. Rodríguez-Hernández, “Innovation in Additive Manufacturing Using Polymers: A Survey on the Technological and Material Developments,” Polymers 2022, Vol. 14, Page 1351, vol. 14, no. 7, p. 1351, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.3390/POLYM14071351.
  10. M. Bertolino, D. Battegazzore, R. Arrigo, and A. Frache, “Designing 3D printable polypropylene: Material and process optimisation through rheology,” Addit Manuf, vol. 40, p. 101944, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1016/J.ADDMA.2021.101944.
  11. T. D. Ngo, A. Kashani, G. Imbalzano, K. T. Q. Nguyen, and D. Hui, “Additive manufacturing (3D printing): A review of materials, methods, applications and challenges,” Compos B Eng, vol. 143, pp. 172–196, Jun. 2018, doi: 10.1016/J.COMPOSITESB.2018.02.012.
  12. A. Kantaros, E. Soulis, F. I. T. Petrescu, and T. Ganetsos, “Advanced Composite Materials Utilized in FDM/FFF 3D Printing Manufacturing Processes: The Case of Filled Filaments,” Materials 2023, Vol. 16, Page 6210, vol. 16, no. 18, p. 6210, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.3390/MA16186210.
  13. D. K. Rajak, P. H. Wagh, and E. Linul, “A Review on Synthetic Fibers for Polymer Matrix Composites: Performance, Failure Modes and Applications,” Materials 2022, Vol. 15, Page 4790, vol. 15, no. 14, p. 4790, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.3390/MA15144790.
  14. W. Xu et al., “3D printing for polymer/particle-based processing: A review,” Compos B Eng, vol. 223, p. 109102, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1016/J.COMPOSITESB.2021.109102.

Article full text

Download PDF