TECHNOLOGIES

Investigation of Cutting Edge Radius Influence on Tool Wear Using FEM Simulation in DEFORM 3D

  • 1 Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, Faculty of Material Science and technology in Trnava, Slovakia
  • 2 Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, Faculty of Material Science and technology in Trnava, Slovakia1

Abstract

This article presents a study of the influence of cutting edge rounding on the wear of monolithic milling tools using the finite element method (FEM) and DEFORM 3D software. After manufacturing by grinding, monolithic milling tools have considerably sharp cutting edges that are prone to breakage and chipping. Industrial practice and cutting edge zone theory recommend edge preparation to create a defined cutting edge radius. The optimal radius value depends on the machined material, cutting conditions, and other factors, and remains unclear. This study investigates the influence of the cutting edge radius on tool wear using 3D FEM simulation with the Usui wear model, which is considered suitable for machining processes. Initial simulations with sharp cutting edges were performed to determine the sensitivity of wear predictions to the Usui model constants. Subsequently, different cutting edge radii were simulated under identical cutting conditions. The simulation results demonstrate the relationship between cutting edge radius and wear progression. The findings provide guidelines for selecting suitable cutting edge preparation parameters to minimize tool wear when milling with monolithic tools.

Keywords

References

  1. Y. Altintas, Manufacturing Automation (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2012)
  2. V.P. Astakhov, Tribology of Metal Cutting (Elsevier, 2006)
  3. B. Denkena, D. Biermann, CIRP Ann. 63, 631 (2014)
  4. C.J.C. Rodriguez, Cutting edge preparation (PhD Thesis, Kassel Univ., 2009)
  5. C.F. Wyen, K. Wegener, CIRP Ann. 59, 93 (2010)
  6. T. Özel, T.K. Hsu, E. Zeren, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 25, 262 (2005)
  7. P.J. Arrazola et al., CIRP Ann. 62, 695 (2013)
  8. DEFORM User Manual (Scientific Forming Technologies Corp., Columbus, OH, 2023)
  9. E. Usui, T. Shirakashi, T. Kitagawa, Wear 100, 129 (1984)
  10. Y.C. Yen et al., J. Mater. Process. Technol. 146, 82 (2004)
  11. G.R. Johnson, W.H. Cook, Proc. 7th Int. Symp. Ballistics, 541 (1983)
  12. S.P.F.C. Jaspers, J.H. Dautzenberg, J. Mater. Process. Technol.122, 322 (2002)
  13. A. Attanasio et al., CIRP Ann. 57, 61 (2008)
  14. M. Binder, F. Klocke, D. Lung, Wear 330-331, 600 (2015)
  15. N.E. Karkalos, A.P. Markopoulos, Procedia Manuf. 22, 107 (2018)
  16. M. Vozár, Influence of cutting edge microgeometry (Dissertation, STU Bratislava, 2022)
  17. M. Necpal, T. Vopát, M. Vozár, Acta Tech. Napoc. 67(1s) (2024)

Article full text

Download PDF