Modeling travel behavior onboard of privately autonomous vehicle and shared autonomous vehicle

  • 1 Department of Transport Technology and Economics Budapest University of Technology and Economics


The impact of travel time, travel cost, and multitasking availability on the selection of privately use AV (PAV) and shared AV (SAV) are examined. The main daily trip is only studied, where all trips are within urban areas. A stated preference (SP) survey which includes a discrete choice experiment, was designed and distributed in Budapest, Hungary to collect the preferences of people towards PAV and SAV. As a result, a sample size of 2056 observations was obtained from the survey. A discrete choice modeling approach was applied to the data using a conditional logit (CL) model, where the characteristics of the alternatives are considered. The analysis results show that the value of travel time (VOT) of SAV is lower than AV, and the probability of choosing a transport mode is increased when multitasking is available in a transport mode. Moreover, the impact of travel cost on transport mode choice is higher than the impact of travel time. In conclusion, people are more likely to select SAV over PAV when the multitasking availability is considered as one criterion in the transport mode selection.



  1. Hamadneh, J. and D. Esztergár-Kiss, Potential Travel Time Reduction with Autonomous Vehicles for Different Types of Travellers. Promet - Traffic&Transportation, 2021. 33(1): p. 61-76. DOI:10.7307/ptt.v33i1.3585
  2. Becker, G. S., A Theory of the Allocation of Time. The economic journal, 1965: p. 493-517. DOI:10.2307/2228949
  3. Mackie, P. J., S. Jara-Dıaz, and A. Fowkes, The value of travel time savings in evaluation. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics Transportation Review, 2001. 37(2-3): p. 91-106. DOI:10.1016/S1366-5545(00)00013-2
  4. Belenky, P., The value of travel time savings: departmental guidance for conducting economic evaluations, revision 2. Department of Transportation, 2011.
  5. Varghese, V. and A. Jana, Impact of ICT on multitasking during travel and the value of travel time savings: Empirical evidences from Mumbai, India. Travel Behaviour, 2018. 12: p. 11- 22. DOI:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.02.007
  6. Steck, F., et al., How autonomous driving may affect the value of travel time savings for commuting. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2018. 2672(46): p. 10. DOI:10.1177/0361198118757980
  7. Kouwenhoven, M. and G. de Jong, Value of travel time as a function of comfort. Journal of choice modelling, 2018. 28: p. 97- 107. DOI:10.1016/j.jocm.2018.04.002
  8. Cherlow, J. R., Measuring values of travel time savings. Journal of Consumer Research, 1981. 7(4): p. 360-371. DOI:10.1086/208826
  9. Coppola, P. and D. Esztergár-Kiss, Autonomous Vehicles and Future Mobility. 2019: Elsevier.
  10. Etzioni, S., et al., Modeling cross-national differences in automated vehicle acceptance. Sustainability, 2020. 12(22): p. 9765. DOI:10.3390/su12229765
  11. Berliner, R. M., et al., Travel-based multitasking: modeling the propensity to conduct activities while commuting, in Transportation Research Board 94th Annual Meeting. 2015: Washington DC, United States.
  12. Ettema, D. and L. Verschuren, Multitasking and value of travel time savings. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2007. 2010(1): p. 19-25. DOI:10.3141%2F2010-03
  13. Keseru, I., et al., Multitasking on the go: An observation study on local public transport in Brussels. Travel Behaviour Society, 2020. 18: p. 106-116. DOI:10.1016/j.tbs.2019.10.003
  14. Malokin, A., G. Circella, and P. L. Mokhtarian, How do activities conducted while commuting influence mode choice? Using revealed preference models to inform public transportation advantage and autonomous vehicle scenarios. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2019. 124: p. 82-114. DOI:10.1016/j.tra.2018.12.015
  15. Litman, T., Valuing transit service quality improvements. Journal of Public transportation, 2008. 11(2): p. 3. DOI:10.5038/2375-0901.11.2.3
  16. Banerjee, I. and A. Kanafani, The value of wireless internet connection on trains: Implications for mode-choice models, in UC Berkeley, U.o.C.T. Center, Editor. 2008: Berkeley.
  17. Singleton, P. A., Discussing the “positive utilities” of autonomous vehicles: will travellers really use their time productively? Transport reviews, 2019. 39(1): p. 50-65. DOI:10.1080/01441647.2018.1470584
  18. Khaloei, M., A. Ranjbari, and D. Mackenzie, Analyzing the Shift in Travel Modes’ Market Shares with the Deployment of Autonomous Vehicle Technology. 2019.
  19. Zhong, H., et al., Will autonomous vehicles change auto commuters’ value of travel time? Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 2020. 83: p. 102303. DOI:10.1016/j.trd.2020.102303
  20. Horni, A., K. Nagel, and K. W. Axhausen, The multi-agent transport simulation MATSim. 2016: Ubiquity Press London. 620.
  21. Hamadneh, J. and D. Esztergár-Kiss. Impacts of Shared Autonomous Vehicles on the Travelers’ Mobility. in 2019 6th International Conference on Models and Technologies for Intelligent Transportation Systems (MT-ITS). 2019. Poland: IEEE. DOI:10.1109/MTITS.2019.8883392
  22. Cirillo, C. and K. W. Axhausen, Evidence on the distribution of values of travel time savings from a six-week diary. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2006. 40(5): p. 444-457. DOI:10.1016/j.tra.2005.06.007
  23. DeSerpa, A. C., A theory of the economics of time. The Economic Journal, 1971. 81(324): p. 828-846. DOI:10.2307/2230320
  24. Xumei, C., L. Qiaoxian, and D. Guang, Estimation of travel time values for urban public transport passengers based on SP survey. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering Information Technology, 2011. 11(4): p. 77-84. DOI:10.1016/S1570- 6672(10)60132-8
  25. Janssen, C. P. and J. L. Kenemans. Multitasking in autonomous vehicles: Ready to go? in 3rd Workshop on User Experience of Autonomous Vehicles at AutoUI’15. 2015. Nottingham, UK: ACM Press.
  26. Ortega, J., et al., Simulation of the Daily Activity Plans of Travelers Using the Park-and-Ride System and Autonomous Vehicles: Work and Shopping Trip Purposes. Applied Sciences, 2020. 10(8): p. 2912. DOI:10.3390/app10082912
  27. Hauber, A. B., et al., Statistical methods for the analysis of discrete choice experiments: a report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Good Research Practices Task Force. Value in health, 2016. 19(4): p. 300-315. DOI:10.1016/j.jval.2016.04.004
  28. Simoni, M. D., et al., Congestion Pricing in a World of Self-driving vehicles: an Analysis of Different Strategies in Alternative Future Scenarios. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2018. 98: p. 167-185. DOI:10.1016/j.trc.2018.11.002
  29. Gurumurthy, K. M. and K. M. Kockelman, Modeling Americans’ autonomous vehicle preferences: A focus on dynamic ride-sharing, privacy & long-distance mode choices. Technological Forecasting Social Change, 2020. 150: p. 119792. DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119792
  30. Lavieri, P. S. and C. R. Bhat, Modeling individuals’ willingness to share trips with strangers in an autonomous vehicle future. Transportation research part A: Policy and Practice, 2019. 124: p. 242-261. DOI:10.1016/j.tra.2019.03.009
  31. Bozorg, S. L. and S. M. Ali, Potential Implication of Automated Vehicle Technologies on Travel Behavior and System Modeling. 2016.
  32. Kolarova, V., F. Steck, and F. J. Bahamonde-Birke, Assessing the effect of autonomous driving on value of travel time savings: A comparison between current and future preferences. Transportation Research Part A: Policy Practice, 2019. 129: p. 155-169. DOI:10.1016/j.tra.2019.08.011
  33. Wadud, Z. and F. Y. Huda, The potential use and usefulness of travel time in fully automated vehicles, in Transportation Research Board 97th Annual Meeting. 2018: Washington DC, United States.
  34. Bansal, P., K. M. Kockelman, and A. Singh, Assessing public opinions of and interest in new vehicle technologies: An Austin perspective. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2016. 67: p. 1-14. DOI:10.1016/j.trc.2016.01.019
  35. Burghout, W., P. J. Rigole, and I. Andreasson. Impacts of shared autonomous taxis in a metropolitan area. in Proceedings of the 94th annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington DC, 2015. 2015.
  36. Krueger, R., T. H. Rashidi, and J. M. Rose, Preferences for shared autonomous vehicles. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2016. 69: p. 343-355. DOI:10.1016/j.trc.2016.06.015
  37. Stoiber, T., et al., Will consumers prefer shared and pooled-use autonomous vehicles? A stated choice experiment with Swiss households. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2019. 71: p. 265-282. DOI:10.1016/j.trd.2018.12.019
  38. Cascetta, E., Random utility theory, in Transportation systems analysis. 2009, Springer. p. 89-167.
  39. Hoffman, S. D. and G. J. Duncan, Multinomial and conditional logit discrete-choice models in demography. Demography, 1988. 25(3): p. 415-427. DOI:10.2307/2061541

Article full text

Download PDF