Thermodynamic analysis of a 17.5 MW geothermal power plant operating with binary Organic Rankine Cycle
- 1 University of Rijeka, Faculty of Engineering, Rijeka, Croatia
This article presents the thermodynamic analysis of a 17.5 MW gross electric geothermal power plant based on binary cycle technology with isobutane. The geothermal power plant comprises two separate closed loops: the geothermal fluid flows in one loop and the Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) fluid flows in the second loop. The geothermal fluid is extracted from a depth of 2500-3000 m with a temperature of 170 °C and a pressure of 25 bar. Two production wells supply geothermal fluid (brine and steam) with a high fraction of noncondensable gases (NCG). A separator extracts NCG from the geothermal fluid. Isobutane is preheated and evaporated before entering the ORC turbine with a temperature of 133 °C and a pressure of 28 bar, where expands to the condenser pressure of 4 bar. Electricity is generated by a 17.5 MW axial ORC turbine and additionally by a 1.5 MW NCG turbine. The analysis revealed that the configuration without NCG turbine achieves a net efficiency of 12.73% and a net electric power of 13.68 MW while the configuration with NCG turbine achieves a net efficiency of 14.04% and a net electric power of 15.16 MW but with much higher CO2 emissions into the atmosphere.
- G.W. Huttrer, Geothermal power generation in the world 2015- 2020 update report, Proceedings World Geothermal Congress 2020, Reykjavik, Iceland, April 26 – May 2, 2020.
- BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2020, 69th edition, London, UK, 2020. https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/ energy-economics/statistical-review-of-world-energy.html
- IRENA: Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2019, International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
- W. Moomaw, P. Burgherr, G. Heath, M. Lenzen, J. Nyboer, A. Verbruggen, Annex II in IPCC: Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation, 2011.
- N. Javanshir, S. Mahmoudi, M.A. Rosen, Thermodynamic and Exergoeconomic Analyses of a Novel Combined Cycle Comprised of Vapor-Compression Refrigeration and Organic Rankine Cycles, Sustainability (2019), 11, 3374.
- F.A. Latrash, B. Agnew, M.A. Al-Weshahi, N.M. Eshoul, Optimal Selection of Using Fluids (HFC, HCFC, HFC) for an Organic Rankine Cycle Utilizing a Low Temperature Geothermal Energy Source, 5th International Conference on Environment Science and Engineering, Vol. 83 (2015).
- K. Darvish, M.A. Ehyaei, F. Atabi, M.A. Rosen, Selection of Optimum Working Fluid for Organic Rankine Cycles by Exergy and Exergy-Economic Analyses, Sustainability (2015), 7, 15362-15383.
- M. Akbari, S. Mahmoudi, M. Yari, M.A. Rosen, Energy and Exergy Analyses of a New Combined Cycle for Producing Electricity and Desalinated Water Using Geothermal Energy, Sustainability (2014) 6, 1796-1820.
- N. Javanshir, S. Mahmoudi, M.A. Kordlar, M.A. Rosen, Energy and Cost Analysis and Optimization of a Geothermal-Based Cogeneration Cycle Using an Ammonia-Water Solution: Thermodynamic and Thermoeconomic Viewpoints, Sustainability (2020), 12(2), 484.
- M.A. Ehyaei, A. Ahmadi, M.A. Rosen, A. Davarpanah, Thermodynamic Optimization of a Geothermal Power Plant with a Genetic Algorithm in Two Stages. Processes (2020), 8, 1277.
- Angelo Algieri, Energy Exploitation of High-Temperature Geothermal Sources in Volcanic Areas - a Possible ORC Application in Phlegraean Fields, Energies (2018), 11, 618.
- P. Morrone, A. Algieri, Integrated Geothermal Energy Systems for Small-Scale Combined Heat and Power Production: Energy and Economic Investigation. Applied Science (2020), 10, 6639.
- T. Prasetyo, M.D. Surindra, W. Caesarendra, T. Taufik, A. Glowacz, M. Irfan, W. Glowacz, Influence of Superheated Vapour in Organic Rankine Cycles with Working Fluid R123 Utilizing Low-Temperature Geothermal Resources. Symmetry (2020), 12, 1463.
- M. Guercio, J. Bonafin, The Velika Ciglena geothermal binary power plant, Proceedings of the 6th African Rift Geothermal Conference, 2-4 November 2016, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
- M. Bošnjaković, M. Stojkov, M. Jurjević, Environmental impact of geothermal power plants, Technical Gazette (2019), 26 (5), 1515-1522.
- R. DiPippo: Geothermal Power Plants: Principles, Applications, Case Studies and Environmental Impact, 4th Edition, Butterworth-Heinemann, Waltham, MA, USA, 2016.
- J. Bonafin, C. Pietra, A. Bonzanini, P. Bombarda: CO2 emissions from geothermal power plants: evaluation of technical solutions for CO2 reinjection, European Geothermal Congress 2019, 11-14 June 2019, Den Haag, The Netherlands.
- A. Baldacci, R. Dupont, C. Piemonte: Electricity generation from NCG (non-condensable gases) expansion in Latera geothermal plant, Latium, Italy, Bulletin d’Hydrogeologie (1999), 17, 415-423.
- B. Tramošljika, P. Blecich, I. Bonefač ić, V. Glažar: Advanced ultra-supercritical coal-fired power plant with post-combustion carbon capture: analysis of electricity penalty and CO2 emission reduction, Sustainability (2021), 13(2), 801.