Ensuring the ornithological safety of aircraft flights in conditions of deep uncertainty

  • 1 The International Centre of Decision Choice and Analysis of the National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE University) Moscow, Russian Federation


Analysed the influence of the threat of an aircraft collision with birds as the most important factor in flight safety (bird strike problem). An analytical review of aviation accidents with birds for the period 2010-2022 was carried out. The problem of ensuring ornithological flight safety considered as decision-making under conditions of uncertainty problem. Existing approaches to assessing the level of ornithological danger in aviation and decision-making are discussed. A scenario approach to reducing the risk of bird strike danger as a task of decisions making in conditions of uncertainty is proposed



  1. ICAO Electronic Bulletin: 2008 - 2015 Wildlife Strike Analyzes, 2017.
  2. Meer Ahmad A.M. «Bird-strike aircraft accidents and their prevention» Asian Journal of Science and Technology, 2019, 10, (01), 9251-9257.
  3. Statistics of collisions with birds and other animals. Official website of the Federal Air Transport Agency of the Russian Federation (Rosaviation). Available at: (accessed 08.15.2023).
  4. ICAO Doc 9137: Airport Services Manual Part 3 - Wildlife Control and Reduction, 4th edition, 2012.
  5. ICAO Annex 14 (Aerodromes).
  6. Guidelines for ornithological support of flights in civil aviation (ROOP GA-89)
  7. The Russian Federation Ministry of Transport will develop rules to combat the danger created by animals at airfields. Rossiyskaya Gazeta. Available at: (accessed 09.13.2023).
  8. AC 150/5200-33C: Hazardous Wildlife Attractants on or near Airports, FAA, 21 Feb. 2020.
  9. FAA «Lessons Learned from Transport Airplane Accidents»: Bird Hazards.
  10. World Birdstrike Association. Available at: (accessed 09.16.2023).
  11. Recommended Practices No. 1. Standards For Aerodrome Bird/ Wildlife Control. International Birdstrike Committee. Available at: (accessed 09.18.2023).
  12. International Birdstrike Committee. Available at: (accessed: 09.21.2023).
  13. «Miracle in the corn field». Available at: (accessed 09.24.2023).
  14. National Transportation Safety Board (January 21, 2009). NTSB Issues update on investigation into ditching of US Airways jetliner into Hudson River.
  15. van Es, G.W.H. and H.H. Smith. 1999. A Method for Predicting Fatal Bird Strike Rates at Airports. NLR-CR-99322. Rijkswaterstaat, Directie Noordzee.
  16. International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). Available at: (accessed 09.28.2023).
  17. Ilyichev V.D. Zashhita samoletov i drugix obektov ot pticz. Ilyichev V.D. [et al.]; resp. ed. O. L. Silaeva. - Moscow: Partnership scientific. ed. KMK, 2007. - 319 p.
  18. Jacobi V.E. Biologicheskie osnovy predotvrashheniya stolknovenij samolyotov s pticzami. M.: Nauka, 1974, 166 p.
  19. Yudkin V.A., Grabovsky M.A. Kolichestvennyj metod ocenki ornitologicheskoj obstanovki na aerodrome. Nauchnyi Vestnik MGTU GA, Moscow. Volume 21, No. 04, 2018. DOI: 10.26467/2079-0619-2018-21-4-48-59 (in Russian)
  20. Elisov L.N., Ovchenkov N.I., Filippov V.L., Konyaev E.A., Laptev A.A. Sistemnyj podxod i chelovecheskij faktor v ornitologicheskoj bezopasnosti aeroporta. Nauchnyi Vestnik MGTU GA. 2019;29:99-106.
  21. Sharov V.D., Vorobiev V.V. Ogranicheniya po ispolzovaniyu matricy IKAO pri ocenke riskov dlya bezopasnosti poletov. Nauchnyi Vestnik MGTU GA. 2016;(225):179-187.
  22. Guziy A.G., Kostina A.P. Metodologicheskij podxod k kolichestvennomu ocenivaniyu riska, obuslovlennogo stolknoveniem vozdushnyx sudov s pticzami. Nauchnyi Vestnik MGTU GA. 2022;25(5):12-24.
  23. Guziy, A.G., Kapustin, A.G., Lushkin, A.M. & Fokin, A.V. (2019). Quantitative risk estimation methodology for flight safety in airline segment of commercial aviation. Civil Aviation High Technologies, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 33–42.
  24. Doc 9859: Safety Management Manual (SMM). 4th ed. ICAO, 2018.
  25. Aviation rules. Part 139. Certification of airfields (AP- 139): put into effect by order of the Ministry of Transport of the Russian Federation dated July 5, 1994 No. 48.
  26. Federal aviation rules for flights in the airspace of the Russian Federation. FAP-136: put into effect by order of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, the Ministry of Transport of the Russian Federation and the Russian Aviation and Space Agency dated March 31, 2002 No. 136/42/51
  27. Atkinson E.A., Banker R.D., Kaplan R.S., Jung M.S. Upravlencheskij uchyot. - St. Petersburg: Dialectics LLC, 2019. - 880 p. — ISBN 978-5-907144-70-5.
  28. Vikhansky O. S. Strategicheskoe planirovanie: Uchebnik. Moscow. Moscow State University Publishing House. 1995
  29. Kahneman, Daniel. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk: Daniel Kahneman, Amos Tversky // Econometrica - 1979. - Vol. XVII.
  30. Marchau Vincent A. W. J., Walker Warren E., Bloemen Pieter J. T. M., Popper Steven W. (Editors). Decision Making under Deep Uncertainty: From Theory to Practice. Springer, 2019 - 405 pp.
  31. Course program «Special chapters of decision theory», The International Center of Decision Choice and Analysis (the DeCAn center) of the National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE University). Available at: f586653943, (accessed 26.09.2023)

Article full text

Download PDF