Security & Future
Vol. 9 (2025), Issue 2, pg(s) 32-34

THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS OF SECURITY

Strengthening Psychological Resilience in Crisis Management: Theoretical and Methodological Perspectives

  • 1 Czech Technical University in Prague, Kladno, Czech Republic
  • 2 AMBIS University, Praha, Czech Republic
  • 3 University of Defence, Brno, Czech Republic

Abstract

Security as a scientific category represents one of the pillars of the theoretical foundations of modern society, with its significance manifested not only in the protection of the state and its institutions but also in the preservation of the stability and integrity of human communities. Contemporary concepts of security reflect both its absolute and relative dimensions, highlighting the necessity of an interdisciplinary approach that encompasses political science, sociology, psychology, and technical sciences. Within this framework, the issue of psychological resilience of crisis managers emerges as a critical factor, as they face extraordinary events and ensure the functioning of key security systems. The aim of this paper is to present the strengthening of psychological resilience among crisis managers as a significant determinant for enhancing the effectiveness of crisis management and the functioning of security structures. The theoretical background is grounded in a problem-solving approach to security and in a social systems perspective, both of which emphasize the capacity of individuals and organizations to respond to dynamic threats. Methodologically, the contribution draws on the concept of resilience, which in the field of security studies connects individual competencies with the institutional framework of crisis management. Psychological resilience is perceived not only as a fundamental individual need but also as a prerequisite for sustaining the democratic functioning of the state and its institutions. Strengthening resilience through systematic education, training, and the implementation of innovative methodologies supports the prevention of burnout, improves the quality of decision-making processes, and enables the effective management of crises. The paper concludes by formulating the basic principles of building resilience systems as an integral component of the theory of security, with particular emphasis on the links to national interest, the protection of fundamental rights and freedoms, and the preservation of state sovereignty.

Keywords

References

  1. Buzan, B., L. Hansen, 2009. The Evolution of International Security Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  2. Baldwin, D. A., 1997. The concept of security. Review of International Studies. 23(1), 5–26.
  3. Ullman, R. H., 1983. Redefining security. International Security. 8(1), 129–153.
  4. Buzan, B., 1991. People, States & Fear: An Agenda for International Security Studies in the Post-Cold War Era. 2nd ed. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
  5. Masten, A. S., 2001. Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development. American Psychologist. 56(3), 227–238.
  6. Holling, C. S., 1973. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 4, 1–23.
  7. Lalonde, C., 2010. Resilience and good-living in communities. In: Disaster Resilience: An Integrated Approach. Springfield: Charles C. Thomas, 285–303.
  8. Snyder, C. R., S. J. Lopez (eds.), 2009. Oxford Handbook of Positive Psychology. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
  9. Paton, D., D. Johnston, 2001. Disasters and communities: vulnerability, resilience and preparedness. Disaster Prevention and Management. 10(4), 270–277.
  10. Weick, K. E., K. M. Sutcliffe, 2007. Managing the Unexpected: Resilient Performance in an Age of Uncertainty. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  11. Connor, K. M., J. R. Davidson, 2003. Development of a new resilience scale: The Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Depression and Anxiety. 18(2), 76–82.
  12. Southwick, S. M. a D. S. Charney, 2012. Resilience: The Science of Mastering Life’s Greatest Challenges. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  13. Phillips, A., 2018. Exploring Burnout and Perceived Stress in Emergency Managers during Deployments. Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies, 4979. Minneapolis: Walden University. Available from: scholarworks.waldenu.edu.
  14. Lawn, S., L. Roberts, E. Willis, L. Couzner, L. Mohammadi a E. Goble, 2020. The effects of emergency medical service work on the psychological, physical, and social well-being of ambulance personnel: a systematic review of qualitative research. BMC Psychiatry. 20, 348. DOI 10.1186/s12888-020-02752-4.
  15. Papazoglou, K., 2023. Stress, prevention, and resilience among first responders. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 20(24), 7174. DOI 10.3390/ijerph20247174.
  16. Guilaran, J., I. De Terte, K. Kaniasty a C. Stephens, 2018. Psychological outcomes in disaster responders: A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effect of social support. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science. 9(3), 344–358. DOI 10.1007/s13753-018-0184-7.
  17. Mao, X., Y. Suo, X. Wei a Y. Luo, 2025. Resilience enhancement interventions for disaster rescue workers: a systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine. 33, 91. DOI 10.1186/s13049-025-01397-0.
  18. Antony, J., R. Brar, P. A. Khan, M. Ghassemi, V. Nincic, J. P. Sharpe, S. E. Straus a A. C. Tricco, 2020. Interventions for the prevention and management of occupational stress injury in first responders: a rapid overview of reviews. Systematic Reviews. 9, 121. DOI 10.1186/s13643-020-01367-w.
  19. Goksu, M. G., N. S. Soral A Z. Sofuoglu, 2025. Factors affecting psychological resilience in first responders and rescue team members. European Psychiatry. 68(S1), S898–S899. DOI 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.1824

Article full text

Download PDF